Page 158 - 4188
P. 158

156

                 Consumer choice and producer innovation informed and motivated
         by  higher  gas  prices  will  do  more  than  arbitrary  CAFE  standards  to
         reduce  gas  consumption  in  the  most  appropriate  ways.  In  response  to
         higher gas prices and information from automobile suppliers unrestricted

         by  CAFE  standards,  people  can  use  information  on  their  individual
         circumstances to reduce gasoline consumption at far less cost than can
         be  achieved  with  orders  issued  by  politicians  making  decisions  in  an

         almost  complete  informational  vacuum.  Yet  politicians  are  far  more
         likely to increase censorship by restricting increases in gas prices with
         price controls, or threats against the petroleum industry, than they are to
         eliminate CAFE standards.

                 Health Care Insurance
                 Politicians  have  complained  for  decades  that  privately  provided
         health  care  in  America  is  excessively  costly  with  too  many  people

         unable  to  afford  health  care  insurance,  and  they  have  promised  to  do
         something about this problem. Yet the political approach to reforming
         the  private  provision  of  health  care  has  consistently  distorted  and

         suppressed  the  communication  of  information  needed  to  inform  and
         motivate better health care at lower cost and to make health insurance
         available at reasonable cost.

                 First,  by  not  taxing  the  value  of  employer-provided  health
         insurance, but generally requiring direct payments for medical care to be
         paid with after-tax income, the federal tax code informs employees that
         low-deductible, low-co-pay health insurance is cheaper than it really is.8

                 And  by  distorting  the  information  consumers  need  to  make
         sensible decisions on health insurance—information on relative costs of
         health  insurance  with  different  deductibles  and  co-payments—we  also

         distort decisions  on  the  use  of  health  care.  Second,  state  governments
         have responded to the political influence of various providers of medical
         care by requiring that employer-provided health insurance cover a large
         number  of  services  that  many  employees  do  not  want  or  need  (see

         Cogan,  Hubbard,  and  Kessler  2005:  41–46).  This  excess  coverage
         increases the price of health insurance, telling consumers that it is more
         costly than it needs to be, which results in fewer people buying health

         insurance.
                 When people have low deductible-low co-pay health insurance, the
         direct prices paid for medical care communicate to consumers that the cost

         of that care, once they pay the deductible, is only a fraction of the real cost.
         This  distorted  information  results  in  consumers  demanding  care  well
   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163