Page 144 - 4187
P. 144
144
This view will, ... despite criticism, continue to persist.
• It may be helpful nevertheless ... to summarize P.
There is no clear way of testing P; ... nevertheless, we can refine Q.
To assess, ... nevertheless, whether P, we turned to Q.
Nevertheless it has been advocated ... that P.
Nevertheless, ... Q constitutes only a necessary, but not a sufficient, test of P.
• All typologies, regardless of how subtle, ... can destroy the complexities of
experience.
Quasars must weigh 100 million suns, ... regardless of how long they live.
Economists argue that unless people ... are charged for P, Q will happen.
We cannot do P ... unless we are provided with information/ we understand Q.
• This strategy ... may sound attractive, but its disadvantages are impressive.
But this definition ... is insufficient (vague)/ would not be productive.
For further purposes of the present article ... P will not be questioned, but it
should be pointed out that Q.
• But at best, ... this can only be partial. We can explain P ... if we assume Q.
If we examine P, ... we shall see that Q. If P is correct, ... then Q.
Scientists are investigating ... whether P could threaten Q.
The question of whether P ... is being addressed by scientists.
It is difficult to determine/ We have no idea ...whether P.
We aim here to determine ... whether P differs from Q.
To assess whether P, ... we turned to Q.
The question is not whether P, ... but rather, Q.
Disagreement can arise ... as to whether P.
• These predictions are simplistic, ... hence unrealistic.
These phenomena are viewed as developments from, ... hence evidence for, P.
P and Q are two different kinds of mechanism, ... and hence show, different
patterns.
It is hard to judge Р/ P would be appropriate here ... since Q.
P casts doubt on the analysis, ... since it is not clear that Q.
P is the most promising, ... since it was designed to be platform-independent.
We start by P ... since this is where the problem is well-defined.
Since P is erroneous/ less evident, ... a new set of terms is offered.
Since we are assuming/ have assumed that P, ... we can reasonably expect Q.
• As an example, we shall take/ consider P ... rather than Q.
This approach is descriptive ... rather than normative.
We need a relative ... rather than absolute scale here.
The difference between P and Q is one of degree ... rather than kind.
Such cases would support, ... rather than conflict with traditional analyses.
Rather than (doing) P ... I propose to group rules into sets.
There is another important dimension here, ... namely that of P.
There is a principle common to Q and R, ... namely, P.
This set, namely P, ... is not equal to' Q.
There is a particular aspect/ factor of P, ... namely its function, which is
important here. Atomic bonding follows the same rule as phase equilibrium,