Page 144 - 4187
P. 144

144

                    This view will,  ... despite criticism, continue to persist.
               •     It may be helpful nevertheless ... to summarize P.
                    There is no clear way of testing P;  ... nevertheless, we can refine Q.
                    To assess, ... nevertheless, whether P, we turned to Q.
                    Nevertheless it has been advocated  ... that P.
                    Nevertheless, ... Q constitutes only a necessary, but not a sufficient, test of P.
               •     All  typologies,  regardless  of  how  subtle,    ...  can  destroy  the  complexities  of
                     experience.
                    Quasars must weigh 100 million suns,  ... regardless of how long they live.
                    Economists argue that unless people ... are charged for P,   Q will happen.
                    We cannot do P   ... unless we are provided with information/ we understand Q.
               •     This strategy ... may sound attractive, but its disadvantages are impressive.
                    But this definition ... is insufficient (vague)/ would not be productive.
                    For  further  purposes  of  the  present  article  ...  P  will  not  be  questioned,  but  it
                     should be pointed out that Q.
               •     But at best, ... this can only be partial.  We can explain P ... if we assume Q.
                    If we examine P, ... we shall see that Q.      If P is correct, ... then Q.
                    Scientists are investigating    ... whether P could threaten Q.
                    The question of whether P ... is being addressed by scientists.
                    It is difficult to determine/ We have no idea ...whether P.
                    We aim here to determine ... whether P differs from Q.
                    To assess whether P, ... we turned to Q.
                    The question is not whether P, ... but rather, Q.
                    Disagreement can arise ... as to whether P.
               •     These predictions are simplistic, ... hence unrealistic.
                    These phenomena are viewed as developments from, ... hence evidence for, P.
                    P  and  Q  are  two  different  kinds  of  mechanism,  ...  and  hence  show,  different
                     patterns.
                    It is hard to judge Р/ P would be appropriate here ... since Q.
                    P casts doubt on the analysis, ... since it is not clear that Q.
                    P is the most promising, ... since it was designed to be platform-independent.
                    We start by P ... since this is where the problem is well-defined.
                    Since P is erroneous/ less evident,      ... a new set of terms is offered.
                    Since we are assuming/ have assumed that P, ... we can reasonably expect Q.

               •     As an example, we shall take/ consider P      ... rather than Q.
                    This approach is descriptive   ... rather than normative.
                    We need a relative ... rather than absolute scale here.
                    The difference between P and Q is one of degree ... rather than kind.
                    Such cases would support,       ... rather than conflict with traditional analyses.
                    Rather than (doing) P  ... I propose to group rules into sets.
                    There is another important dimension here, ... namely that of P.
                    There is a principle common to Q and R, ... namely, P.
                    This set, namely P, ... is not equal to' Q.
                    There is a particular aspect/ factor of P,     ...  namely  its  function,  which  is
                      important  here.  Atomic  bonding  follows  the  same  rule  as  phase  equilibrium,
   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149